As I alluded to in the footnotes of last week’s music pick (because, you know, I am in fact deluded enough to believe that not only is everyone opening my music picks, but they’re reading my critical blurbs therein and they’re reading the footnotes), I’m prone to making pretty disparate comparisons with music in my mind.
This song is maybe the best example of that. Its unique shape, rhythm construction and layering just gets my structure aficionado juices pumping (God, aren’t I like the coolest person ever?).
The second comparison that comes to mind—the one I’m starting out with to put off being written off as crazy for as far into the post as possible—is Radiohead’s “The National Anthem.” I think this comparison makes a lot more sense to normal people because, for one, it’s a rock song—an electronic alternative rock song at that—so the genres lineup nicely. Also, the sounds aren’t too incongruent with the brassy sounds entering for a prominent role in the chaotic climax. It’s the progression toward that climax that’s the biggest similarity to me: the driving opening that repeats throughout the piece while everything else around it piles on their parts until what was once a driving opening is now just some part that’s somewhere in there, reminding you that it’s the same song.
The cacophony of free style at the climax sets the two songs apart, though, and the climax is what made me think of the original comparison: Mozart’s “Introitus” to hisRequiem. There’s just a much cleaner, more resourceful style to the respective climaxes of “Introitus” and “Sweepstakes” that’s impossible for me to not marvel at. It’s not like these are the only two pieces to’ve ever introduced several parts that the listener may not have expected would be combined later in the song only to, you know, combine them later in the song. “Introitus” just happens to be the one of which I think as an impressive execution of it, the once-gentle string intro being reprised as a heavy, dooming dirge to reintroduce all the vocal parts in a steady climb to the apex, only to leave you solemn again at the end.
Enter Mos Def and a cast of cartoon musicians with a misspelled moniker. The first time hearing this song I was probably even more shocked by my reaction than you may be (because I didn’t have the benefit of the incredulousness and eye rolling to which my reader is welcome). A mish mash of rhythms and time signatures and instruments (everything from the electronic to the brassy to the rapping) and verses and refrains just continue to layer and layer in increasing improbability until the piece finds a way to exi--at which poinnt, all of the sudden we’re fading out on whistles and techno riff and whispered refrain. And my most prominent resonance was relating to 220-year-old funeral mass.
Again, I’m going with a band that has maintained both mainstream success and critical acclaim. That third and most important criteria I outlined in last week’s pick (ie, likeing them) applies even more here, as I’m extremely fond of the Gorillaz, especially each of their last three albums.
But I’m going to attempt to dissolve all pretense right now by saying that there is at least some ounce of rhetoric to my music picks. I’m not going to pretend that the sole criteria for these picks is that they’re the best pieces of music ever (whatever that means) or even that they’re my favorite pieces of music ever (whatever that means). I’m well aware of and mean to be in conversation with the fact that these picks say things well beyond just that—about the picker, about music in general, about what I think you could be listening to outside of what you're already listening to, etc.
And this is a perfect case of that. Though it very well might be, I have no idea if this is my favorite Gorillaz song; hell, I don't even know if it's my favorite song off of the album. For all I know, and this is of great probability, I appreciate this song more than I enjoy listening to it. But I made this pick because, if nothing else, it introduces my somewhat non-standard, structure-oriented approach to music.
Its unique shape, rhythm construction and layering just gets my structure aficionado juices pumping . . . [etc.]
People always seem to have that one thing about popular music that annoys them the most. They’ll say that Lady Gaga represents all that is wrong with music today or they’ll say that rapping or the use of electronic noises and voice mods and such is the bane of music’s modernity or they’ll say that your Sounds Like Nickleback Quotient is in direct correlation to n where n is the number of terribles you are.
My biggest annoyance with anything that surrounds popular music is with how image-oriented it all seems to be. People seem to pick music with the most prominent criteria being it "listening to it better not make me look too gay" (or too punk or too hipster or too poppy or too black, etc). I say it surrounds popular music because I'm not necessarily sure of whom to blame here—if this is all the record companies’ fault or if it’s just that so many of us have never matured past the teenager-in-identity-crisis mode and there just happens to be music that takes advantage of that.
Anyway, probably the second most common approach to music is a little more to the point: being sound-oriented.
A week after I spent the entirety of my music pick comparing a Modest Mouse song to a Metallica one, you may not be all that surprised to hear that I don’t consider myself even that much sound-oriented when I approach music.
This song is maybe the best example of that. Its unique shape, rhythm . . . [etc.]