Their selling point this Super Bowl was pretty much what it’s always been: “Do you maybe want to have a chance at possibly seeing a nipple? You better go to GoDaddy.com!” Wait, there’s a place I can go on the internet that has boobies?! How did no one think of this sooner!
I have come to spite the mass GoDaddy.com conspiracy of there being a shortage of nipples on the internet: I assure you, you do not have to go to GoDaddy.com to see attractive women sans clothing. There is, in fact, a multi-billion dollar industry that already exists surrounding this concpet.
I will respond toHollywoodin a language thatHollywoodcan understand: by completely ripping off a blog done by Joe Mathlete who was in turn repackaging a critique of Broadway done years ago.
My plagiarism starts with this, by re-re-stating, “Hollywoodused to be a breeding ground; now it’s a receptacle.”
Now I will summarize all of the movies that were advertised during the Super Bowl: Act of Valor (if you’ve never seen an action movie before in your life, then you will likely find this to be original entertainment), The Avengers (based on a comic book series, which was basically a rip off to DC’s own super-hero dream team), The Lorax (based on a Dr. Seuss book that already has a perfectly good animated movie version, but now it has DANNY DEVITO! . . . so basically it’s a rip off of the concept of The Grinch with Jim Carey), GI Joe 2 (the sequel to a movie that was based on a cartoon series for children), Battleship (based on a . . . wait for it . . . board game—a board game, no less, that became popular in spite of there being slightly more strategy involved in its gameplay than Go Fish).
The kudos of being most original plagiarists goes to Disney. They win this award by doing the most obscure rip off with John Carter. Congrats, Disney, on proving that 10-year-olds are harsher critics than the average movie goer.
30 Rock did a more succinct version of this rant:
tl;dr: F*ck,Hollywood. You have taken the most promising of art forms (an art form that combines writing with sound and with the visual with all of modern special effects at their disposal) and have made it unbearable sh*t.
Note: All credit for this post goes to Joe Mathlete. Click that link. Click it now.
Can I say that I am NOOOOOO sort of car aficionado, but god damned there are some sweet new cars coming out that look awesome. The new VW looks like something I’d actually want to drive, the new Optima is pretty sweet for a Kia and holy **** did you see that Acura?! Of course, this isn’t a blog about products; it’s a blog about commercials, and car commercials seem to be set on continuing the trend of sucking.
I believe I first noticed this trend (that is, the trend of car commercials sucking) about 10 years ago. There was an ad for an SUV (I don’t remember what car; of course I don’t remember what car; car commercials are god awful at branding; that’s kind of my point) that showed the car trudging through difficult terrain—running over rocks and fallen trees and driving through bushes and all of this crazy sh*t—with native Amazonians in the back seat playing drums along with the whole excursion. Finally, the car stops and lets the natives out in the middle of the jungle at what you can presume to be their home. The slogan was probably something along the lines of “it gets you wherever you’re trying to go.” Basically, for all of those who have a good chance of running into some brand of Native Americans who need a ride to the heart of the Amazon pronto, this is the car for you—for all others, you may find our featured abilities of being able to blast through bushes and run over boulders to be quite worthless.
The 2012 Super Bowl continued this trend of self-defeating logic. You have some pickup truck commercial showing some pickup truck towing like 35 jet skis, 4 boats, a Thanksgiving Day float, a continent and ANOTHER PICKUP TRUCK! So for all of those who just cannot settle for anything less than 35 jet skis, you better not settle for the second best in towing.
You have some other commercial showing the car bungee jumping and sky diving and jumping giant skateboards. I was exaggerating talking about the pickup truck commercial, but believe it or not, I am actual being completely literal when I describe this one.
Honda’s commercial with Matthew Broderick playing hooky would make more sense if their tagline were “Our cars are kinda sorta like Ferraris,” but that tagline doesn’t make any sense, so I guess this commercial’s premise is just doomed to make zero sense regardless.
Speaking of taglines, I guess Toyota’s commercial showing the baby reinvented to be a poopless time machine is meant to be accompanied by the slogan, “There is stuff we haven’t invented.” So yeah, now that you know some things that Toyotahasn’t invented, I guess you have no choice but to buy a Toyota. It all makes perfectly good sense.
In fact, it’s quite a statement when the car commercial most in tune with reality is a Silverado ad that touts how it can survive the apocalypse just in case a misinterpreted, several-millennia-old prophesy holds up and you do in fact have to make your purchasing decisions with the end of the world in mind. I mean, I’m more likely to want to prepare for the end of the world than I am to jump over a 100-foot-long skateboard or to confuse a Honda with a Ferrari, so Silverado wins by default!
Actually, I lied. My favorite car ad was the one introducing the new VW bug. It had a cute dog, an 80s-style montage and featured as its climax the unveiling of an original, pretty-damned-good-looking car. There weren’t any explosions or celebrity cameos or abortions —just a cute dog, a simple, well-executed premise and the unveiling of a good product at the climax. So it’s a win. I actually thought that the Star Wars stuff at the end was meh, and—guess what?—it detracted from the product which I just said looked pretty sweet and was much more memorable when it was at the climax/forefront of the commercial instead of being sandwiched between an entertaining montage and a meh reference.
Watering down the advertising of a sweet product with stuff like flying squirrel suits actually segues perfectly into my next bit . . .
Okay, so now that I’ve rewatched the commercial, I remember what I was thinking in the first 30 seconds. It was something along the lines of, “Woah, that **** is awesome; cool. Woah look at what that phone does. Oh man, that’s actually really cool,” etc.
Of course, I say that I only remember this now because I’d forgotten all about the product because the only thing I think of when remembering this commercial is that it’s that one with The Darkness in it playing that song that makes people chuckle with skateboard tricks and guys shooting out of cannons and all that crap. /deep breath
Hell, even if the commercial ended at the 30-second mark—before going into the whole OMG WE’RE ON DURING THE SUPER BOWL SO WE HAVE TO MAKE THIS SONG FART SPARKLE SAUCE!—the whole cliché setup of being trapped and so not free until now because now we can draw with a pen on our phones is some kind of transparently dumb juxtaposition with reality. To put it in simpler terms: I’m an iPhone user, and I can say that I don’t feel trapped by my inability to write on it with a pen.
Again, I thought this product was pretty dazzling (even if silly), but setting it up in some kind of statement of IF YOU CAN’T HAVE THIS FEATURE THEN YOU’RE DOOMED only points out how silly I should feel for having felt dazzled in the first place. Maybe it’s just me, and I’m just not quite part of that privileged, white person class who can have really cool stuff, but if I’m not, then they must really be marketing toward an infinitesimally small group.
Though I’m not one of those insane-o-Apple-philes, I can say that they are extremely good at marketing (duh), so it’s funny that Samsung would fight against Apple by going in the complete opposite direction of those simple, clean commercials Apple has of showing us really wowing (yet, in the grand scheme of things, pretty dumb) apps and features. And they just let those really wowing (yet, in the grand scheme of things, pretty dumb) apps and features speak for themselves. By piling on stupid superfluousness (even if you’re clearly trying to be ironic about adding stupid superfluousnesses to your commercial) just makes me think at the end of the commercial, “oh, it’s another Super Bowl ad for some thing.”